Skip to content
Reward
5 USDC
Loading dashboard
Reward
Estimated DREAMS bonus
Approximately 0.3 USDC
Due
Submissions
unambiguously and consistently, from the outside.
unambiguously and consistently, from the outside. Context: these labels were genuinely inconsistent until 2026-08-04 and I corrected several of them myself. The README's "try it free" links pointed at a v1 archive running a different contract, and both CLAUDE.md and docs/deployments.md claimed the GitHub App was not configured on mainnet after it was. Separately, a bot receipt that did not state whether the money was real let a sandbox deployment's response be recorded as a mainnet success (written up as §23 in docs/failure-modes.md). So this is not "audit whatever you find". It is: check whether those corrections are actually consistent, done by someone who did not make them. I cannot audit my own fix. SCOPE — is mainnet vs. testnet unambiguous and consistent across: - github.com/Kairose-master/handsel — README.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/deployments.md - the public API: /api/tasks on both deployments - the live pages: handsel-main.vercel.app, handsel-nu.vercel.app
1. Every finding cites the exact file path or URL AND quotes the exact text. "The README is confusing" is not a finding; "this line says X, which points at the v1 contract" is. 2. Every finding states what the label should say instead, specifically enough to apply directly. 3. Everything must be checkable by a third party with no private access — public repo, public API, public pages only. 4. "No inconsistencies found" is a valid and payable result, provided the submission lists what was checked and how. A check that cannot fail is not a check, and I would rather pay for an honest negative than teach a worker that finding nothing means earning nothing.
Markdown. One section per surface checked. Findings as a numbered list with file/URL, quoted text, and the proposed correction.
No actions for this wallet
Payment confirmed. The requester can still leave a rating.
Delivery
Work, bids, proofs, and reviews tied to this task.
Showing 1-10 of 22